里約熱內盧，打擊販毒的戰爭貌似拍片～
作者：yanlesong518
时间：2011-08-09 13:32:00
作者：生命不重要7
时间：2012-07-25 15:32:00
@yanlesong518 2011-8-9 13:32:00
果然！毕竟毒贩也是真情实弹！更精彩在这里！
-----------------------------
揭露挖几千个人心肝的窝点---山东潍坊 割喉挖人心肝。山东潍坊-寿光市纪台镇九阜官庄村丁爱凤，2004年9月27日在寿光市（原）田马镇人民医院二胎分娩。被医师一针夺去母子生命。并以尸检为由割喉开膛破肚，挖取体内全部器官和小孩，制成商品·标本·试验品等。此手段惨不忍睹，泯灭人性，残忍至极。遗体(证据)至今还在停尸场冷冻。转。。。这是其中一例。
百度搜索---挖人心肝浮现人间山东潍坊寿光市纪台镇九阜官庄村丁爱凤——查看
因我空间多次被封杀，敬请收藏以便查验。
郑重声明：只要我有自由身，我将一直喊到真实处理结果并及时发布，不管几年，甚至一生，至死方休。。。
2012年7月24日
果然！毕竟毒贩也是真情实弹！更精彩在这里！
-----------------------------
揭露挖几千个人心肝的窝点---山东潍坊 割喉挖人心肝。山东潍坊-寿光市纪台镇九阜官庄村丁爱凤，2004年9月27日在寿光市（原）田马镇人民医院二胎分娩。被医师一针夺去母子生命。并以尸检为由割喉开膛破肚，挖取体内全部器官和小孩，制成商品·标本·试验品等。此手段惨不忍睹，泯灭人性，残忍至极。遗体(证据)至今还在停尸场冷冻。转。。。这是其中一例。
百度搜索---挖人心肝浮现人间山东潍坊寿光市纪台镇九阜官庄村丁爱凤——查看
因我空间多次被封杀，敬请收藏以便查验。
郑重声明：只要我有自由身，我将一直喊到真实处理结果并及时发布，不管几年，甚至一生，至死方休。。。
2012年7月24日
作者：中国是负责的政府
时间：2013-04-20 15:22:00
Judge how baked sweet potatoes
On pleading
Appellant: Gao Xiang, male, born April 14, 1971, Han nationality, no job
Appellee: Qiqihar Lianhua Supermarket Holdings Co., Ltd., place of residence, Jianhua District, Aceh District Fushun
Appellee: Chi valuable, male, born on February 17, 1963, Han nationality, Aceh the Lianhua Supermarket shareholder Warburg Group Chairman, live in Aceh Jianhua District Fushun cell
Appellee: LI Yan-chun, identity card number 152101196201101523 Address: Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang Shiqiao East Peace a 2-403 room
Appellee: Lu Yongsheng, identity card number 310109196306120017 Address: North Sichuan Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai 1515, Lane No. 56 court cattle Xiaoguang, said Lu Yongsheng is a legal person, the decision also written.
Appellee: Chun-Tian Zhang, ID number 230228640514001, address: Lonza District, Aceh civil aviation too East Committee 75
The appeal request
A request is revoked in accordance with [2009] Jian Min Chu Zi No. 131 Civil Judgment 3 judgment follows the "Second, dismissed the plaintiff's claim.
Second, interest, late payment damages calculation methods have objections, do not agree with the amount of 5384.67 yuan.
Requirements the late valuable 68,376.85 yuan arrears and interest jointly and severally liable. Late valuable shell company to defraud, Lianhua Supermarket how to obtain a qualified investment projects? A short period of time related to the hundreds of cases of late valuable in itself is a legal fact.
Fourth, the report no later than valuable action a long time, travel expenses, meals, lodging, lost income, mental combat threats who bears the late valuable should bear, the court should bear. Not, as chaos, to apply for state compensation.
Handling the case of passing the buck, buck-passing, and jurisdiction limits a super super, Provincial Politics and Law Committee chase (June 29, 2009), the provincial Supreme Court judgment under chase (September 4, 2009), I was on 7 September 2009 take the date of the judgment, verdict date is March 12, 2009, I returned to the judge on March 14, 2009, Liu 1000 Post Express Mail Service, which has pleadings three, called to ask that he had received the judgment of the Court the Qigao file: the issue of human Wang Ling (09 June 8 date), nuclear draft people atrium fruit × × signature (09 June 8 date), the draft human Xiao-one thousand, clear judgment in the case verdict "2009 3 May 12 "? This is the impact of the ruling position of the Communist Party of China, is how to practice the scientific concept of development to the party? Acceptance of it? Only the central can lead you directly? A time when the 60th anniversary of the motherland, the political and legal system repeated orders to maintenance of stability, the parties stabilization? The files in the provincial departments have been archived. The legal three first what?
On pleading
Appellant: Gao Xiang, male, born April 14, 1971, Han nationality, no job
Appellee: Qiqihar Lianhua Supermarket Holdings Co., Ltd., place of residence, Jianhua District, Aceh District Fushun
Appellee: Chi valuable, male, born on February 17, 1963, Han nationality, Aceh the Lianhua Supermarket shareholder Warburg Group Chairman, live in Aceh Jianhua District Fushun cell
Appellee: LI Yan-chun, identity card number 152101196201101523 Address: Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang Shiqiao East Peace a 2-403 room
Appellee: Lu Yongsheng, identity card number 310109196306120017 Address: North Sichuan Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai 1515, Lane No. 56 court cattle Xiaoguang, said Lu Yongsheng is a legal person, the decision also written.
Appellee: Chun-Tian Zhang, ID number 230228640514001, address: Lonza District, Aceh civil aviation too East Committee 75
The appeal request
A request is revoked in accordance with [2009] Jian Min Chu Zi No. 131 Civil Judgment 3 judgment follows the "Second, dismissed the plaintiff's claim.
Second, interest, late payment damages calculation methods have objections, do not agree with the amount of 5384.67 yuan.
Requirements the late valuable 68,376.85 yuan arrears and interest jointly and severally liable. Late valuable shell company to defraud, Lianhua Supermarket how to obtain a qualified investment projects? A short period of time related to the hundreds of cases of late valuable in itself is a legal fact.
Fourth, the report no later than valuable action a long time, travel expenses, meals, lodging, lost income, mental combat threats who bears the late valuable should bear, the court should bear. Not, as chaos, to apply for state compensation.
Handling the case of passing the buck, buck-passing, and jurisdiction limits a super super, Provincial Politics and Law Committee chase (June 29, 2009), the provincial Supreme Court judgment under chase (September 4, 2009), I was on 7 September 2009 take the date of the judgment, verdict date is March 12, 2009, I returned to the judge on March 14, 2009, Liu 1000 Post Express Mail Service, which has pleadings three, called to ask that he had received the judgment of the Court the Qigao file: the issue of human Wang Ling (09 June 8 date), nuclear draft people atrium fruit × × signature (09 June 8 date), the draft human Xiao-one thousand, clear judgment in the case verdict "2009 3 May 12 "? This is the impact of the ruling position of the Communist Party of China, is how to practice the scientific concept of development to the party? Acceptance of it? Only the central can lead you directly? A time when the 60th anniversary of the motherland, the political and legal system repeated orders to maintenance of stability, the parties stabilization? The files in the provincial departments have been archived. The legal three first what?
作者：中国是负责的政府
时间：2013-04-20 15:23:00
It comes to late valuable case to solve are late (but there are a few exceptions, this is the exception to the exception) the court why? The shank is held in late valuable hand, let us mediation.
7, the applicable law is wrong. "Company Law" after the introduction of the Companies Act, in a word contribution is not in place, can be sentenced later than valuable losing business file can be proved that the Law is not introduced before the Constitution, the Civil Code, the Civil Procedure Law, "regulations of the State Council, the Supreme Court judicial interpretation of" the same legal principle can be sentenced later than losing valuable. And if someone wants to change the business file, that is the responsibility of the Trade and Industry Bureau.
8, in violation of procedure. It is the "the clerk: Yang Lianqi (the verdict is already written Duties)" one person, asking and records, court clerks have the right ad litem? Judgment on why there is a collegial panel, Lian Liu Qian to take the verdict (taken on September 7, 2009) also asked me why I want to buy a house in Aceh, do not understand the merits. The other two judges Zhang Wenhui, Zheng Yujie from start to finish was not involved in the trial of the case, I have not seen the two judges.
9, in this case an appeal fee borne by the appellee.
Facts and grounds
1, judgments typo, individual logic is unclear, evidence of one, two, three ...... discussed.
8 September 2,2009 Jianhua court files copied, 89 (single-sided), I asked Judge Liu 1000 with no sealed Liu 1000 stresses "do not sealed." The books are not binding, random broken stack.
3, the reason a lot of small, free evaluation of evidence by the judge. In fact, everyone is not easy, because there is fruit, also a lot of facts.
The first-instance judgment [2009] Jian Min Chu Zi No. 131 Civil Judgment firmly appeal, not mediation.
Yours
Aceh Intermediate People's Court
Appellant: Gao Xiang
The other two judges Zhang Wenhui, Zheng Yujie from start to finish was not involved in the trial of the case, I have not seen the two judges. The legend is baked sweet potatoes.
Pass
Say
Be
Roast
Ground
Melon
Of
September 18, 2009
7, the applicable law is wrong. "Company Law" after the introduction of the Companies Act, in a word contribution is not in place, can be sentenced later than valuable losing business file can be proved that the Law is not introduced before the Constitution, the Civil Code, the Civil Procedure Law, "regulations of the State Council, the Supreme Court judicial interpretation of" the same legal principle can be sentenced later than losing valuable. And if someone wants to change the business file, that is the responsibility of the Trade and Industry Bureau.
8, in violation of procedure. It is the "the clerk: Yang Lianqi (the verdict is already written Duties)" one person, asking and records, court clerks have the right ad litem? Judgment on why there is a collegial panel, Lian Liu Qian to take the verdict (taken on September 7, 2009) also asked me why I want to buy a house in Aceh, do not understand the merits. The other two judges Zhang Wenhui, Zheng Yujie from start to finish was not involved in the trial of the case, I have not seen the two judges.
9, in this case an appeal fee borne by the appellee.
Facts and grounds
1, judgments typo, individual logic is unclear, evidence of one, two, three ...... discussed.
8 September 2,2009 Jianhua court files copied, 89 (single-sided), I asked Judge Liu 1000 with no sealed Liu 1000 stresses "do not sealed." The books are not binding, random broken stack.
3, the reason a lot of small, free evaluation of evidence by the judge. In fact, everyone is not easy, because there is fruit, also a lot of facts.
The first-instance judgment [2009] Jian Min Chu Zi No. 131 Civil Judgment firmly appeal, not mediation.
Yours
Aceh Intermediate People's Court
Appellant: Gao Xiang
The other two judges Zhang Wenhui, Zheng Yujie from start to finish was not involved in the trial of the case, I have not seen the two judges. The legend is baked sweet potatoes.
Pass
Say
Be
Roast
Ground
Melon
Of
September 18, 2009
